Polam Kopitiam food poisoning survivors upset by light sentences|Formosa English News

觀看數觀測
尚無歷史觀測
本站尚未儲存這部影片的歷史觀測,無法據以建立歷史時間序列。
共同標籤
已比對共同詞彙 · 11 個標籤 · 比對時間 2026/11/12 下午11:17
比對依據(57 處)
- The影片說明…ix people died, yet the sentences handed do…
- The影片說明…nces handed down in the deadly Polam Kopiti…
- food影片說明…adly Polam Kopitiam food poisoning case from…
- The影片說明… families outraged. The heaviest sentence w…
- The影片說明…r and 10 months for the owner of the franch…
- The影片說明…hs for the owner of the franchise. One surv…
- The影片說明…. One survivor says the punishment is simpl…
- The影片說明… kidney damage from the poisoning. The verd…
- The影片說明…from the poisoning. The verdict has reignit…
- The影片說明…reserve evidence in the aftermath. - I am …
- The影片說明…ix lives were lost. The sentence is way too…
- The影片說明… back tears outside the courtroom. She is o…
- The影片說明…room. She is one of the survivors of the Po…
- The影片說明…of the survivors of the Polam Kopitiam mass…
- food影片說明…Polam Kopitiam mass food poisoning case, and…
- The影片說明…ys she can’t accept the sentence. Ms. Huan…
- food影片說明…uang Polam Kopitiam food poisoning survivor …
- IT影片說明… poisoning survivor It’s unreal, ludicrous…
- DO影片說明…bly start having to do kidney dialysis. …
- The影片說明…i Fang-hsuan During the subsequent testing …
- The影片說明…uld not have caused the rice noodles to dev…
- The影片說明… noodles to develop the bacteria, which had…
- Taiwan影片說明…re been detected in Taiwan. The food poisonin…
- The影片說明…etected in Taiwan. The food poisoning case…
- food影片說明…ted in Taiwan. The food poisoning case took…
- The影片說明…ning, and six died. The franchise owner has…
- The影片說明…nt homicide. One of the cooks received a se…
- The影片說明…ntence of 8 months, the other a sentence of…
- The影片說明…mmutable to a fine. The store manager was a…
- The影片說明…ed of all charges. The food poisoning inci…
- food影片說明…f all charges. The food poisoning incident …
- The影片說明…political issue. In the recent mayoral deba…
- The影片說明…table, and that all the victims and their f…
- The影片說明…ceive compensation. The comment did not sit…
- WHO影片說明…vors and relatives, who found it triggering…
- IT影片說明…elatives, who found it triggering. Among t…
- WHO影片說明…them was Ms. Huang, who took part in a radi…
- The影片說明…view one day before the verdict. She recoun…
- ONCE影片說明…ounted that she had once run into mayoral ca…
- The影片說明…aipei’s response to the poisoning had been …
- The影片說明…ral Candidate (DPP) The city government can…
- City影片說明…Candidate (DPP) The city government cannot s…
- Government影片說明…date (DPP) The city government cannot shirk its re…
- The影片說明…s I’ve said before, the mayor does not cont…
- The影片說明…or does not control the courts. But the may…
- The影片說明…rol the courts. But the mayor is responsibl…
- The影片說明…Wan-an Taipei Mayor The court should impose…
- The影片說明…hat penalties under the Act Governing Food …
- food影片說明…r the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitati…
- The影片說明… lawmakers to amend the law and increase th…
- Law影片說明…makers to amend the law and increase the pe…
- The影片說明…he law and increase the penalties. Chiang …
- Government影片說明…t forgotten how his government botched investigati…
- The影片說明…d investigations in the aftermath of the in…
- The影片說明…in the aftermath of the incident. For more…
- food影片標題Polam Kopitiam food poisoning survivors…
- News影片標題…ces|Formosa English News
比對版本
youtube-quality-20261017-a
影片說明
Bilingual text here: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026B12W02EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description 雙語文字版: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026B12W02EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description Our official website: ➔ https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/ Follow us on Facebook: ➔ https://www.facebook.com/ftvformosanews X (Twitter): ➔ https://x.com/FTV_Taiwan_News Six people died, yet the sentences handed down in the deadly Polam Kopitiam food poisoning case from 2024 have left survivors and victims’ families outraged. The heaviest sentence was 1 year and 10 months for the owner of the franchise. One survivor says the punishment is simply too lenient, as she continues to suffer serious kidney damage from the poisoning. The verdict has reignited a political firestorm, with victims’ families accusing Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s administration of failing to properly preserve evidence in the aftermath. - I am absolutely shocked. Six lives were lost. The sentence is way too light. Ms. Huang chokes back tears outside the courtroom. She is one of the survivors of the Polam Kopitiam mass food poisoning case, and says she can’t accept the sentence. Ms. Huang Polam Kopitiam food poisoning survivor It’s unreal, ludicrous. How can such a major incident be let go with such light punishment? After I got poisoned, I had Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, with a kidney function of just over 30%. I’ll probably start having to do kidney dialysis. Voice of Liu Shang-ming Lawyer for franchise owner Li Fang-hsuan During the subsequent testing process, one thing was clearly established: a lack of refrigeration alone would not have caused the rice noodles to develop the bacteria, which had never before been detected in Taiwan. The food poisoning case took place at a Polam Kopitiam branch in Taipei in 2024. Two cooks and an intern had served diners dishes that used rice noodles from opened bags that were being stored at room temperature. A total of 33 people contracted bongkrekic acid poisoning, and six died. The franchise owner has been sentenced to 1 year and 10 months in prison for negligent homicide. One of the cooks received a sentence of 8 months, the other a sentence of 6 months commutable to a fine, and an intern a sentence of 4 months also commutable to a fine. The store manager was acquitted of all charges. The food poisoning incident has become a political issue. In the recent mayoral debate for Taipei, Mayor Chiang Wan-an said he had made sure that Polam Kopitiam would be held accountable, and that all the victims and their families would receive compensation. The comment did not sit well with survivors and relatives, who found it triggering. Among them was Ms. Huang, who took part in a radio interview one day before the verdict. She recounted that she had once run into mayoral candidate Puma Shen and told him that Taipei’s response to the poisoning had been far too slow. Puma Shen Taipei Mayoral Candidate (DPP) The city government cannot shirk its responsibility to address municipal issues. As I’ve said before, the mayor does not control the courts. But the mayor is responsible for inspections, for seizing evidence or assets, ensuring investigations continue, and preventing those responsible from hiding or transferring their assets. Chiang Wan-an Taipei Mayor The court should impose a harsh sentence. I’ve long said that penalties under the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation are not severe enough. That’s why we’ve been speaking with lawmakers to amend the law and increase the penalties. Chiang says he wants a harsh sentence. But victims and their families say they haven’t forgotten how his government botched investigations in the aftermath of the incident. For more Taiwan news, tune in: Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152 Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53 #ricenoodles #kopitiam #taipei #沈伯洋 #蔣萬安 #台灣新聞 #FormosaEnglishNews #民視新聞 #FTV新聞 #Taiwan
本頁的資料來源與計算方式
影片的數字
- 公開統計
- 觀看、喜歡與留言總數是取得當時的 YouTube 公開統計,不是即時數值;各項統計的觀測時間可能不同。「資料最後記錄」是影片資料的記錄時間,不代表觀看、喜歡或留言都在那時重新觀測。
- 觀看歷史
- 圖上每個點是實際儲存的觀測,連線只為方便閱讀,不代表中間時間的測量值;沒有歷史觀測時不建立時間序列。
- 喜歡占互動
- 喜歡 ÷(喜歡+不喜歡+顯示留言),任一來源缺值時不估算。
- 字幕
- 只記錄來源是否提供字幕,尚未擷取逐字稿,因此字幕不列入標籤比對。
- 觀測分析
- 直播逐時/逐日最高同時在線取自所讀直播紀錄;讀取上限、略過與解析失敗的筆數列在「資料涵蓋範圍與解析限制」。
共同標籤
標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw)。共同標籤以文字比對影片標題與說明,不是 AI 判讀;命中不代表事件歸屬或立場,與頻道分類分開。標題或說明出現標籤,不代表影片主題;可能來自固定宣傳或版權文字。字幕尚未取得,不列入比對。
- 比對範圍
- 僅列出目前詞彙版本與影片標題、說明仍相符的比對結果;待比對或來源文字已變動的影片不列入,數量見「收錄與比對範圍」。
- 期間
- 「往前 N 日」包含今天與前 N 天,共 N+1 個台北日曆日(往前 7 日為 8 個日曆日);指定起訖日期時以實際起訖日為準。日數、日期與小時條件同時套用。
- 命中片段
- 每支影片最多顯示 3 段,標示來自標題、說明或字幕;沒有片段時顯示「沒有命中片段」,來源文字缺漏時顯示「來源文字未提供」,不另行補寫。完整比對依據在影片頁的「共同標籤與比對依據」。
- 顯示排除
- 符合標籤顯示規則的詞(上游排除詞、雜訊、純數字或日期、長度不符,以及核定的來源或平台名稱、雙字通用詞、國家城市政黨詞、少數 YouTube 平台或宣傳用語)整詞不列入排行,但仍保留在原始詞彙池與比對證據中;原始詞彙池列出排除原因。雙字通用詞只依核定清單判定,包含它們的人名、事件或具體議題不會因此被排除。管理員也可以在排行上直接排除個別標籤,同樣只影響排行顯示,每次排除與恢復都留有紀錄。
- 說明欄樣板
- 同一頻道說明欄反覆出現的宣傳段落不列入比對。「24小時」這類詞只在這種重複宣傳段落中略過,出現在一般新聞內容時照常計入;這不同於整詞的顯示排除。
- 示例
- 列表與片段只是符合條件的影片例子,不能用來推算整體比例或全站失真程度;有效比對的影片比例只代表比對完成度。
- 觀看
- 累計觀看是取得當時的公開觀測值,不是期間增量;無觀看值的影片不當作 0。
本頁資料範圍
觀看數與互動數為取得當時的公開觀測值。
資料來源
本站以納入名單的 YouTube 頻道與影片為範圍(名單見頻道觀測),數據來自 YouTube 公開資料與定時觀測:直播約每分鐘輪詢一次,頻道統計、新影片與影片統計則分批輪流更新,所以同一頁的數字不一定在同一時間取得。不涵蓋全 YouTube;缺漏、尚未收錄或資料服務中斷都不等於零,尚未取得的數值顯示「—」。
頁面使用台北時間(UTC+8)。「更新於」是來源已記錄的觀測時間;來源沒有記錄時顯示「未記錄」,不以開啟網頁的時間代替。
共同標籤詞彙的標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw),保留來源、版本與比對依據;本站的頻道分類沿用有影儀表板的來源組織方式,與內容標籤是不同維度。影片數、觀看數與直播同時在線人數分開計算,不代表 YouTube 全站流量,也不表示因果關係。
