Fair Trade Commission blocks Grab’s acquisition of foodpanda|Formosa English News

Formosa English News · 發布於 2026/10/21 下午10:41 · 更新於 2026/10/27 下午10:45 · 台北時間 · 本頁的資料來源與計算方式 ⓘ

觀看數
—次
喜歡
—次
YouTube 留言總數
—則
長度
—
字幕狀態未確認

觀看數觀測

尚無歷史觀測

本站尚未儲存這部影片的歷史觀測,無法據以建立歷史時間序列。

共同標籤

已比對共同詞彙 · 10 個標籤 · 比對時間 2026/10/24 下午12:37

比對依據(49 處)
  1. Taiwan影片說明…com/FTV_Taiwan_News Taiwan’s Fair Trade Commis…
  2. Trade影片說明…_News Taiwan’s Fair Trade Commission has said…
  3. foodpanda影片說明…ab’s acquisition of foodpanda in Taiwan. The prop…
  4. Taiwan影片說明…ion of foodpanda in Taiwan. The proposal was a…
  5. The影片說明…oodpanda in Taiwan. The proposal was announ…
  6. foodpanda影片說明…ant Grab set to buy foodpanda for nearly NT$20 bi…
  7. 20影片說明…panda for nearly NT$20 billion. Ultimately…
  8. The影片說明…billion. Ultimately the merger was blocked …
  9. IT影片說明…ers determined that it would weaken compet…
  10. The影片說明…aken competition in the industry. Let’s hea…
  11. Trade影片說明…sin Chih-chung Fair Trade Commission The merg…
  12. The影片說明…ir Trade Commission The merger would have s…
  13. foodpanda影片說明…seen Grab take over foodpanda’s delivery business…
  14. Taiwan影片說明…elivery business in Taiwan. But Uber, the pare…
  15. Uber影片說明…ness in Taiwan. But Uber, the parent company…
  16. The影片說明…n Taiwan. But Uber, the parent company of U…
  17. Uber影片說明…e parent company of Uber Eats, holds a 13.1%…
  18. The影片說明… stake in Grab, and the two companies have …
  19. foodpanda影片說明…proposal to acquire foodpanda, the majority of co…
  20. The影片說明… acquire foodpanda, the majority of commiss…
  21. IT影片說明… commissioners said it should be stopped. …
  22. The影片說明…would like to thank the Fair Trade Commissi…
  23. Trade影片說明…e to thank the Fair Trade Commission for maki…
  24. The影片說明…mmission for making the right decision. Foo…
  25. foodpanda影片說明…the right decision. Foodpanda is the market leade…
  26. The影片說明…ision. Foodpanda is the market leader in Ta…
  27. Taiwan影片說明…he market leader in Taiwan. When has anyone ev…
  28. The影片說明…as anyone ever seen the top company in any …
  29. Top影片說明…nyone ever seen the top company in any indu…
  30. IT影片說明…out of a market? If it actually does come …
  31. The影片說明… to that, we’ll ask the Commission to consi…
  32. The影片說明…nsider implementing the relevant measures. …
  33. The影片說明…ant measures. Had the merger gone forward…
  34. Uber影片說明…b would have become Uber Eats’ main competit…
  35. The影片說明…ain competitor. But the close ties between …
  36. Uber影片說明… close ties between Uber Eats’ parent compan…
  37. Uber影片說明…ts’ parent company, Uber and Grab, raised co…
  38. The影片說明…ination to maintain the status quo, which w…
  39. IT影片說明…ich would also make it harder for new comp…
  40. The影片說明…ompetitors to enter the market. During the …
  41. The影片說明… the market. During the review, Grab sugges…
  42. Uber影片說明…s, such as diluting Uber’s shareholding and …
  43. On影片說明…placing limitations on board appointments.…
  44. The影片說明…d appointments. But the FTC says the measur…
  45. The影片說明…s. But the FTC says the measures would be d…
  46. Uber影片說明…o implement, unless Uber completely divested…
  47. Trade影片標題Fair Trade Commission blocks G…
  48. foodpanda影片標題…ab’s acquisition of foodpanda|Formosa English New…
  49. News影片標題…nda|Formosa English News
比對版本

youtube-quality-20261017-a

影片說明

Bilingual text here: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026A21W06EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description 雙語文字版: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026A21W06EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description Our official website: ➔ https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/ Follow us on Facebook: ➔ https://www.facebook.com/ftvformosanews X (Twitter): ➔ https://x.com/FTV_Taiwan_News Taiwan’s Fair Trade Commission has said "no" to Grab’s acquisition of foodpanda in Taiwan. The proposal was announced back in March, with Singaporean delivery giant Grab set to buy foodpanda for nearly NT$20 billion. Ultimately the merger was blocked after a majority of commissioners determined that it would weaken competition in the industry. Let’s hear more. Hsin Chih-chung Fair Trade Commission The merger would have seen Grab take over foodpanda’s delivery business in Taiwan. But Uber, the parent company of Uber Eats, holds a 13.1% stake in Grab, and the two companies have close business ties in other markets. After evaluating Grab’s proposal to acquire foodpanda, the majority of commissioners said it should be stopped. Su Po-hao Delivery Industry Rights Alliacne We would like to thank the Fair Trade Commission for making the right decision. Foodpanda is the market leader in Taiwan. When has anyone ever seen the top company in any industry pull out of a market? If it actually does come down to that, we’ll ask the Commission to consider implementing the relevant measures. Had the merger gone forward, Grab would have become Uber Eats’ main competitor. But the close ties between Uber Eats’ parent company, Uber and Grab, raised concerns that could impact fair competition. Regulators said both companies would have shared interests and neither would be motivated to lower prices. There could be a risk of coordination to maintain the status quo, which would also make it harder for new competitors to enter the market. During the review, Grab suggested several steps to minimize concerns, such as diluting Uber’s shareholding and placing limitations on board appointments. But the FTC says the measures would be difficult to implement, unless Uber completely divested its stake in Grab. For more Taiwan news, tune in: Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152 Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53 #uber #foodpanda #ubereats #delivery #taiwan #台灣新聞 #FormosaEnglishNews #民視新聞 #FTV新聞 #Taiwan

本頁的資料來源與計算方式

影片的數字

公開統計
觀看、喜歡與留言總數是取得當時的 YouTube 公開統計,不是即時數值;各項統計的觀測時間可能不同。「資料最後記錄」是影片資料的記錄時間,不代表觀看、喜歡或留言都在那時重新觀測。
觀看歷史
圖上每個點是實際儲存的觀測,連線只為方便閱讀,不代表中間時間的測量值;沒有歷史觀測時不建立時間序列。
喜歡占互動
喜歡 ÷(喜歡+不喜歡+顯示留言),任一來源缺值時不估算。
字幕
只記錄來源是否提供字幕,尚未擷取逐字稿,因此字幕不列入標籤比對。
觀測分析
直播逐時/逐日最高同時在線取自所讀直播紀錄;讀取上限、略過與解析失敗的筆數列在「資料涵蓋範圍與解析限制」。

共同標籤

標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw)。共同標籤以文字比對影片標題與說明,不是 AI 判讀;命中不代表事件歸屬或立場,與頻道分類分開。標題或說明出現標籤,不代表影片主題;可能來自固定宣傳或版權文字。字幕尚未取得,不列入比對。

比對範圍
僅列出目前詞彙版本與影片標題、說明仍相符的比對結果;待比對或來源文字已變動的影片不列入,數量見「收錄與比對範圍」。
期間
「往前 N 日」包含今天與前 N 天,共 N+1 個台北日曆日(往前 7 日為 8 個日曆日);指定起訖日期時以實際起訖日為準。日數、日期與小時條件同時套用。
命中片段
每支影片最多顯示 3 段,標示來自標題、說明或字幕;沒有片段時顯示「沒有命中片段」,來源文字缺漏時顯示「來源文字未提供」,不另行補寫。完整比對依據在影片頁的「共同標籤與比對依據」。
顯示排除
符合標籤顯示規則的詞(上游排除詞、雜訊、純數字或日期、長度不符,以及核定的來源或平台名稱、雙字通用詞、國家城市政黨詞、少數 YouTube 平台或宣傳用語)整詞不列入排行,但仍保留在原始詞彙池與比對證據中;原始詞彙池列出排除原因。雙字通用詞只依核定清單判定,包含它們的人名、事件或具體議題不會因此被排除。管理員也可以在排行上直接排除個別標籤,同樣只影響排行顯示,每次排除與恢復都留有紀錄。
說明欄樣板
同一頻道說明欄反覆出現的宣傳段落不列入比對。「24小時」這類詞只在這種重複宣傳段落中略過,出現在一般新聞內容時照常計入;這不同於整詞的顯示排除。
示例
列表與片段只是符合條件的影片例子,不能用來推算整體比例或全站失真程度;有效比對的影片比例只代表比對完成度。
觀看
累計觀看是取得當時的公開觀測值,不是期間增量;無觀看值的影片不當作 0。

本頁資料範圍

觀看數與互動數為取得當時的公開觀測值。

資料來源

本站以納入名單的 YouTube 頻道與影片為範圍(名單見頻道觀測),數據來自 YouTube 公開資料與定時觀測:直播約每分鐘輪詢一次,頻道統計、新影片與影片統計則分批輪流更新,所以同一頁的數字不一定在同一時間取得。不涵蓋全 YouTube;缺漏、尚未收錄或資料服務中斷都不等於零,尚未取得的數值顯示「—」。

頁面使用台北時間(UTC+8)。「更新於」是來源已記錄的觀測時間;來源沒有記錄時顯示「未記錄」,不以開啟網頁的時間代替。

共同標籤詞彙的標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw),保留來源、版本與比對依據;本站的頻道分類沿用有影儀表板的來源組織方式,與內容標籤是不同維度。影片數、觀看數與直播同時在線人數分開計算,不代表 YouTube 全站流量,也不表示因果關係。

完整的資料來源與計算方式 →