CEC Chair warns against putting all referendums on a single ballot|Taiwan News

Formosa News (民視英語新聞) · 發布於 2026/08/26 下午10:42 · 更新於 2026/08/27 下午02:30 · 台北時間 · 本頁的資料來源與計算方式 ⓘ

觀看數
172次
喜歡
4次
YouTube 留言總數
0則
長度
—
字幕狀態未確認

觀看數觀測

目前僅一筆觀測 ·
172次

共同標籤

這支影片尚未比對共同詞彙

比對版本

youtube-quality-20261017-a

影片說明

Bilingual text here: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026826W03EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description 雙語文字版: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026826W03EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description Our official website: ➔ https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/ Follow us on Facebook: ➔ https://www.facebook.com/ftvformosanews X (Twitter): ➔ https://x.com/FTV_Taiwan_News The Nov. 28 local elections are just three months away, but KMT and TPP lawmakers are poised to make last minute changes that could complicate the entire voting process. Previously, opposition politicians pushed for holding the national referendums on the same day as the local elections this year. And now they also want the three referendums to be placed on the same ballot. Chairman of the Central Election Commission You Ying-Lung worries that these last-minute changes could lead to ballots being counted well past midnight. You Ying-Lung Chairman of Central Election Commission There’s less than 100 days to the election, and now you’re going to push forward these amendments to the Referendum Act. What on Earth is the meaning of this? You Ying-Lung, Chairman of the Central Election Commission, is shaking his head and sighing, all because of amendments to the Referendum Act that are the brainchildren of KMT and TPP politicians, who also pushed to have the referendum vote occur on the same day as the Nov. 28 local elections. Saving time is the primary goal of having the national referendum take place on Nov. 28 as well as having three referendums on a single ballot, yet You warned these changes will be counterproductive. You Ying-Lung Chairman of Central Election Commission When pushing for these amendments, there’s no need to deliberate carefully; so being impulsive like this is the way to go? It sounds as if it’s just a change to the voting method, but, in reality, it’s completely revamping the voting system. The idea is to put all the referendums on a single ballot, but if we use our imaginations the advantages are hollow, yet the resulting disadvantages will be palpable; the bad will outweigh the good. Under no circumstances should we, in such a rush, implement these changes, as the repercussions could be disastrous. Along with other lawmakers who proposed the amendments, KMT legislator Lai Shyh-bao believes that placing all the referendums on a single ballot would simplify the voting process, lower election costs, and speed up vote counting. The CEC has warned multiple times that the proposed changes to Taiwan’s voting system would need to be complemented by additional measures, because, currently, elections involve paper ballots that are filled out by hand and then later on votes are read out loud and tallied. If new measures are introduced, vote counting might not wrap up until late into the night, possibly even later than the 2018 election, which ended at 3 am. Lai Shyh-bao Legislator (KMT) They’re denying the people the right to exercise direct democracy. The amount of referendums was reduced to just three, so is that still too difficult for you to handle? Are we creating some sort of technical problem? And what’s the problem with counting votes until midnight? If that’s the case, then just count until midnight. You Ying-Lung Chairman of Central Election Commission Putting all the referendums on a single ballot doesn’t settle the issue, and this is not just a technical issue. During counting, a single ballot can’t be sorted into two piles at the same time, so that means the ballot will need to be counted multiple times, which damages the transparency of our ballot monitoring system. We can’t just do whatever you legislators think is fit, because the voters are the core purpose of an election. The proposed amendments have already been advanced to a second reading. On Aug. 27 or Aug. 28 the KMT and TPP can use their majority to pass these voting process changes, which means the Nov. 28 local elections might not be settled until the morning of Nov. 29. For more Taiwan news, tune in: Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152 Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53 #KMT #TPP #DPP #referendum #voting #election #ballot #transparency #CEC #台灣新聞 #TaiwanNews #民視新聞 #FTV新聞 #Taiwan

本頁的資料來源與計算方式

影片的數字

公開統計
觀看、喜歡與留言總數是取得當時的 YouTube 公開統計,不是即時數值;各項統計的觀測時間可能不同。「資料最後記錄」是影片資料的記錄時間,不代表觀看、喜歡或留言都在那時重新觀測。
觀看歷史
圖上每個點是實際儲存的觀測,連線只為方便閱讀,不代表中間時間的測量值;沒有歷史觀測時不建立時間序列。
喜歡占互動
喜歡 ÷(喜歡+不喜歡+顯示留言),任一來源缺值時不估算。
字幕
只記錄來源是否提供字幕,尚未擷取逐字稿,因此字幕不列入標籤比對。
觀測分析
直播逐時/逐日最高同時在線取自所讀直播紀錄;讀取上限、略過與解析失敗的筆數列在「資料涵蓋範圍與解析限制」。

共同標籤

標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw)。共同標籤以文字比對影片標題與說明,不是 AI 判讀;命中不代表事件歸屬或立場,與頻道分類分開。標題或說明出現標籤,不代表影片主題;可能來自固定宣傳或版權文字。字幕尚未取得,不列入比對。

比對範圍
僅列出目前詞彙版本與影片標題、說明仍相符的比對結果;待比對或來源文字已變動的影片不列入,數量見「收錄與比對範圍」。
期間
「往前 N 日」包含今天與前 N 天,共 N+1 個台北日曆日(往前 7 日為 8 個日曆日);指定起訖日期時以實際起訖日為準。日數、日期與小時條件同時套用。
命中片段
每支影片最多顯示 3 段,標示來自標題、說明或字幕;沒有片段時顯示「沒有命中片段」,來源文字缺漏時顯示「來源文字未提供」,不另行補寫。完整比對依據在影片頁的「共同標籤與比對依據」。
顯示排除
符合標籤顯示規則的詞(上游排除詞、雜訊、純數字或日期、長度不符,以及核定的來源或平台名稱、雙字通用詞、國家城市政黨詞、少數 YouTube 平台或宣傳用語)整詞不列入排行,但仍保留在原始詞彙池與比對證據中;原始詞彙池列出排除原因。雙字通用詞只依核定清單判定,包含它們的人名、事件或具體議題不會因此被排除。管理員也可以在排行上直接排除個別標籤,同樣只影響排行顯示,每次排除與恢復都留有紀錄。
說明欄樣板
同一頻道說明欄反覆出現的宣傳段落不列入比對。「24小時」這類詞只在這種重複宣傳段落中略過,出現在一般新聞內容時照常計入;這不同於整詞的顯示排除。
示例
列表與片段只是符合條件的影片例子,不能用來推算整體比例或全站失真程度;有效比對的影片比例只代表比對完成度。
觀看
累計觀看是取得當時的公開觀測值,不是期間增量;無觀看值的影片不當作 0。

本頁資料範圍

觀看數與互動數為取得當時的公開觀測值。

時間序列只有一筆有效觀測時,只列出該值與觀測時間,不畫走勢圖;累積兩筆以上才畫圖。

資料來源

本站以納入名單的 YouTube 頻道與影片為範圍(名單見頻道觀測),數據來自 YouTube 公開資料與定時觀測:直播約每分鐘輪詢一次,頻道統計、新影片與影片統計則分批輪流更新,所以同一頁的數字不一定在同一時間取得。不涵蓋全 YouTube;缺漏、尚未收錄或資料服務中斷都不等於零,尚未取得的數值顯示「—」。

頁面使用台北時間(UTC+8)。「更新於」是來源已記錄的觀測時間;來源沒有記錄時顯示「未記錄」,不以開啟網頁的時間代替。

共同標籤詞彙的標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw),保留來源、版本與比對依據;本站的頻道分類沿用有影儀表板的來源組織方式,與內容標籤是不同維度。影片數、觀看數與直播同時在線人數分開計算,不代表 YouTube 全站流量,也不表示因果關係。

完整的資料來源與計算方式 →