NET 86% cotton polo shirt turns out to be 0% cotton and 97.6% polyester|Formosa English News

觀看數觀測
尚無歷史觀測
本站尚未儲存這部影片的歷史觀測,無法據以建立歷史時間序列。
共同標籤
已比對共同詞彙 · 8 個標籤 · 比對時間 2026/11/03 下午10:52
比對依據(39 處)
- The影片說明…oppers are checking the labels when buying …
- The影片說明…rments. But what if the labels are not true…
- The影片說明…ET recently came to the center of a controv…
- The影片說明…mer discovered that the fiber content of a …
- Content影片說明…ered that the fiber content of a polo shirt was…
- The影片說明…uite as advertised. The label said 86% cott…
- The影片說明…no cotton at all in the garment. Let’s hear…
- The影片說明…A shopper felt that the 86% cotton polo shi…
- The影片說明… bought felt odd to the touch and tried to …
- The影片說明…ed to get a refund. The store told him to r…
- The影片說明…o rest assured that the fiber content of th…
- Content影片說明…ured that the fiber content of the garment was …
- The影片說明…he fiber content of the garment was correct…
- The影片說明…nt was correct. But the shopper took it for…
- IT影片說明…ut the shopper took it for a lab test that…
- IT影片說明…lab test that found it was more than 90% p…
- The影片說明…o Bought polo shirt The shop told me they w…
- IT影片說明… me they would take it to get tested. Then…
- IT影片說明…t tested. Then when it came back, they tol…
- IT影片說明… back, they told me it was all correct. I …
- The影片說明…surprised, so I got the polo shirt back and…
- IT影片說明…irt back and I took it to get tested mysel…
- The影片說明… get tested myself. The results then found …
- IT影片說明… results then found it had no cotton at al…
- Content影片說明…c Cares about fiber content If what I wanted to…
- IT影片說明…ouldn’t want to buy it. Member of public …
- On影片說明… public Weighing in on incident Some peopl…
- The影片說明…e really care about the fiber content. Othe…
- Content影片說明…are about the fiber content. Others think that …
- IT影片說明…ink that as long as it’s cheap, it’s alrig…
- Cheap影片說明…hat as long as it’s cheap, it’s alright. Voi…
- IT影片說明…long as it’s cheap, it’s alright. Voice o…
- consumer protection影片說明… Chuan-chien Taipei Consumer Protection Official Businesses…
- Consumers影片說明…nesses must provide consumers with sufficient and…
- The影片說明…e information about the goods or services t…
- The影片說明…iolation may render the business liable for…
- The影片說明…ective immediately, the retailer is offerin…
- The影片說明…itional returns for the disputed garment, h…
- News影片標題…ter|Formosa English News
比對版本
youtube-quality-20261017-a
影片說明
Bilingual text here: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026B03W05EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description 雙語文字版: https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/news/2026B03W05EA?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description Our official website: ➔ https://english.ftvnews.com.tw/ Follow us on Facebook: ➔ https://www.facebook.com/ftvformosanews X (Twitter): ➔ https://x.com/FTV_Taiwan_News With a growing number of people looking for natural fibers in their clothing, more and more shoppers are checking the labels when buying garments. But what if the labels are not true? Taiwanese clothing brand NET recently came to the center of a controversy, after a customer discovered that the fiber content of a polo shirt wasn’t quite as advertised. The label said 86% cotton, but a lab test later found that there was, in fact, no cotton at all in the garment. Let’s hear more. Chen Yen-lin FTV reporter A shopper felt that the 86% cotton polo shirt they bought felt odd to the touch and tried to get a refund. The store told him to rest assured that the fiber content of the garment was correct. But the shopper took it for a lab test that found it was more than 90% polyester. Mr. Chao Bought polo shirt The shop told me they would take it to get tested. Then when it came back, they told me it was all correct. I was very surprised, so I got the polo shirt back and I took it to get tested myself. The results then found it had no cotton at all. Member of public Cares about fiber content If what I wanted to buy was a cotton garment, and what they gave me didn’t contain any cotton, I wouldn’t want to buy it. Member of public Weighing in on incident Some people really care about the fiber content. Others think that as long as it’s cheap, it’s alright. Voice of Lin Chuan-chien Taipei Consumer Protection Official Businesses must provide consumers with sufficient and accurate information about the goods or services they offer. They must not engage in misleading, concealing, or deceptive practices. Any violation may render the business liable for breach of contractual obligations. NET has since issued an apology, admitting to oversights in its internal procedures for product labeling, quality checks, and customer service. Effective immediately, the retailer is offering unconditional returns for the disputed garment, hoping to ease consumer backlash and restore its brand reputation. For more Taiwan news, tune in: Mon to Fri at 9:30 pm on Channel 152 Tue to Sat at 1 am on Channel 53 #net #poloshirt #naturalfibers #fibercontent #cotton #台灣新聞 #FormosaEnglishNews #民視新聞 #FTV新聞 #Taiwan
本頁的資料來源與計算方式
影片的數字
- 公開統計
- 觀看、喜歡與留言總數是取得當時的 YouTube 公開統計,不是即時數值;各項統計的觀測時間可能不同。「資料最後記錄」是影片資料的記錄時間,不代表觀看、喜歡或留言都在那時重新觀測。
- 觀看歷史
- 圖上每個點是實際儲存的觀測,連線只為方便閱讀,不代表中間時間的測量值;沒有歷史觀測時不建立時間序列。
- 喜歡占互動
- 喜歡 ÷(喜歡+不喜歡+顯示留言),任一來源缺值時不估算。
- 字幕
- 只記錄來源是否提供字幕,尚未擷取逐字稿,因此字幕不列入標籤比對。
- 觀測分析
- 直播逐時/逐日最高同時在線取自所讀直播紀錄;讀取上限、略過與解析失敗的筆數列在「資料涵蓋範圍與解析限制」。
共同標籤
標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw)。共同標籤以文字比對影片標題與說明,不是 AI 判讀;命中不代表事件歸屬或立場,與頻道分類分開。標題或說明出現標籤,不代表影片主題;可能來自固定宣傳或版權文字。字幕尚未取得,不列入比對。
- 比對範圍
- 僅列出目前詞彙版本與影片標題、說明仍相符的比對結果;待比對或來源文字已變動的影片不列入,數量見「收錄與比對範圍」。
- 期間
- 「往前 N 日」包含今天與前 N 天,共 N+1 個台北日曆日(往前 7 日為 8 個日曆日);指定起訖日期時以實際起訖日為準。日數、日期與小時條件同時套用。
- 命中片段
- 每支影片最多顯示 3 段,標示來自標題、說明或字幕;沒有片段時顯示「沒有命中片段」,來源文字缺漏時顯示「來源文字未提供」,不另行補寫。完整比對依據在影片頁的「共同標籤與比對依據」。
- 顯示排除
- 符合標籤顯示規則的詞(上游排除詞、雜訊、純數字或日期、長度不符,以及核定的來源或平台名稱、雙字通用詞、國家城市政黨詞、少數 YouTube 平台或宣傳用語)整詞不列入排行,但仍保留在原始詞彙池與比對證據中;原始詞彙池列出排除原因。雙字通用詞只依核定清單判定,包含它們的人名、事件或具體議題不會因此被排除。管理員也可以在排行上直接排除個別標籤,同樣只影響排行顯示,每次排除與恢復都留有紀錄。
- 說明欄樣板
- 同一頻道說明欄反覆出現的宣傳段落不列入比對。「24小時」這類詞只在這種重複宣傳段落中略過,出現在一般新聞內容時照常計入;這不同於整詞的顯示排除。
- 示例
- 列表與片段只是符合條件的影片例子,不能用來推算整體比例或全站失真程度;有效比對的影片比例只代表比對完成度。
- 觀看
- 累計觀看是取得當時的公開觀測值,不是期間增量;無觀看值的影片不當作 0。
本頁資料範圍
觀看數與互動數為取得當時的公開觀測值。
資料來源
本站以納入名單的 YouTube 頻道與影片為範圍(名單見頻道觀測),數據來自 YouTube 公開資料與定時觀測:直播約每分鐘輪詢一次,頻道統計、新影片與影片統計則分批輪流更新,所以同一頁的數字不一定在同一時間取得。不涵蓋全 YouTube;缺漏、尚未收錄或資料服務中斷都不等於零,尚未取得的數值顯示「—」。
頁面使用台北時間(UTC+8)。「更新於」是來源已記錄的觀測時間;來源沒有記錄時顯示「未記錄」,不以開啟網頁的時間代替。
共同標籤詞彙的標籤來源:新文易數(tag.observe.tw),保留來源、版本與比對依據;本站的頻道分類沿用有影儀表板的來源組織方式,與內容標籤是不同維度。影片數、觀看數與直播同時在線人數分開計算,不代表 YouTube 全站流量,也不表示因果關係。
